Electrostatics
When an ebonite rod is rubbed with wool, they get oppositely charged due to conduction. Explain
When a glass rod is rubbed with silk, the charge acquired by the silk is :
When a glass rod is rubbed with silk and brought near a GLE, the leaves of the GLE appear to diverge further. When the glass rod touches the brass of the disc of the GLE, the free electrons from it flow to the glass rod. This causes a deficiency of electrons on the brass disc. To make up for this deficiency the electrons from the fold leaves flow towards the disc. This in turn causes electron deficiency on the gold leaves. As gold leaves as positively charged, they repel each other and hence diverge. Therefore the glass rod has a negative charge. Hence, the charge acquired by the silk is negative charge.
When an ebonite rod is rubbed with wool, they get oppositely charged due to conduction. Explain
Which of the following is NOT a correct method of the preparation of benzylamine from cyanobenzene?
In free space, a particle A of charge $$1 \, \mu C$$ is held fixed at a point P. Another particle B of the same charge and mass $$4 \mu g$$ is kept at a distance of $$1 \, mm$$ from P. if B is released, then its velocity at a distance of $$9 mm$$ from P is : [Take $$\dfrac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} = 9 \times 10^9 Nm^2 C^{-2}$$]
Name two substances which can be charged by friction.
A woolen cloth when rubbed against plastic object acquires ______ charge.
A glass rod when rubbed with silk cloth, acquires a charge of $$1.6\times 10^{-11}C$$, then the charge on silk cloth will be:
The electric charge developed on glass rod rubbed with silk cloth is different from the charge developed on ebonite rod rubbed with fur.
An ebonite rod held in hand can be charged by rubbing with flannel but a copper rod cannot be charged like this. Why?
When a polythene piece is rubbed with wool, it acquires negative charge.
Which of the following statement is NOT true?